Great article, am still reading. Re pneumonia: The new protocol was to withhold antibiotics "as it was a virus". Finished reading - still great article.
The medicos informed me that I had "traces" of viral particles in my lungs, but significant golden staph which is bacterial pneumonia. So anti-biotics are appropriate for treating the golden staph.
Absolutely. The strange thing was that in 2019 a campaign had been run that taught doctors to prescribe less antibiotics what with the growing resistences wink wink, and then during COVID doctors remembered that and prescribed less antibiotics, plus the other campaign reinforced that still, what with "SarsCov2 is a virus and you have viral covid so we won't prescribe you antibiotics because every baby knows you don't prescribe antibiotics for viral illness" wink wink, so that again was just the obvious reason to eliminate use of antibiotics while possibly the real reason for this "covering up why we do things so blatantly differently than usual", narrative was that this way, all the bacterial superinfections were for the first time that season allowed unhindered to kill mainly the elderly. So you were lucky they checked for your staph and then treated it. Maybe you were young and pretty and part of the collectivist future... (Ok the doctors weren't triaging in that way). Your staphylococcus aureus reminds me that one edit of the EU to the WHO treaty or more probably health regulations is to ban over the counter antiseptic salves. Meaning you can prevent full on sepsis only by being lucky with using soap water, and if that fails, either you have taken all injections (many to come) and been a good guy or gal, then you can access a doctor's treatment. Or not, then you can die of your sepsis. Evil, I think.
Great article, am still reading. Re pneumonia: The new protocol was to withhold antibiotics "as it was a virus". Finished reading - still great article.
The medicos informed me that I had "traces" of viral particles in my lungs, but significant golden staph which is bacterial pneumonia. So anti-biotics are appropriate for treating the golden staph.
Absolutely. The strange thing was that in 2019 a campaign had been run that taught doctors to prescribe less antibiotics what with the growing resistences wink wink, and then during COVID doctors remembered that and prescribed less antibiotics, plus the other campaign reinforced that still, what with "SarsCov2 is a virus and you have viral covid so we won't prescribe you antibiotics because every baby knows you don't prescribe antibiotics for viral illness" wink wink, so that again was just the obvious reason to eliminate use of antibiotics while possibly the real reason for this "covering up why we do things so blatantly differently than usual", narrative was that this way, all the bacterial superinfections were for the first time that season allowed unhindered to kill mainly the elderly. So you were lucky they checked for your staph and then treated it. Maybe you were young and pretty and part of the collectivist future... (Ok the doctors weren't triaging in that way). Your staphylococcus aureus reminds me that one edit of the EU to the WHO treaty or more probably health regulations is to ban over the counter antiseptic salves. Meaning you can prevent full on sepsis only by being lucky with using soap water, and if that fails, either you have taken all injections (many to come) and been a good guy or gal, then you can access a doctor's treatment. Or not, then you can die of your sepsis. Evil, I think.
Whoa, it hadn't occurred to me that I might have been lucky to be given anti-biotics. Not that I am sure they did anything.
Anti antibiotics use campaign started early summer 2919 I think when I look at articles on web. Here the WHO horse itself.
https://www.who.int/news/item/18-06-2019-in-the-face-of-slow-progress-who-offers-a-new-tool-and-sets-a-target-to-accelerate-action-against-antimicrobial-resistance
With focus on pneumonia. WINK WINK!
Interesting insight...